Scoring Rubrics and Google Scripts: A Means to Smoothly Provide Language Learners with Fast Corrective Feedback and Grades

Written by
Peer-reviewed:
Permalink:
Language: English

© 2012 Research-publishing.net


Abstract

Language teachers, as one might expect, are often confronted with the task of assessing and grading students' assignments, which should ideally be addressed with respect to not only reliability and validity, but also functionality. Based on Knoch's (2011) taxonomy features with regards to design and development of writing assessments, an analytic approach was devised to assign scores to a certain amount of independent aspects of language learners' performance through the means of specific rubrics. The rubrics, elaborated with the graders and students in mind, describe the rating of the various tasks intermediate learners of French had to undertake. Following a brief description of one assignment, this short paper highlights the significance of following the scoring grids to maintain a relatively constant grading style across students and teachers alike. Additionally, it illustrates how Google documents and forms, used in conjunction with simple and undemanding scripts, assisted in the process of correcting and providing students with timely feedback.

Keywords: scoring rubrics, Google scripts, corrective feedback, language learning.

References

Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Behizadeh, N., & Engelhard, J. G. (2011). Historical view of the influences of measurement and writing theories on the practice of writing assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 189-211. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.03.001

Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x

Knoch, U. (2011). Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: what should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16(2), 81-96. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.003

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211-232. doi: 10.3102/00346543047002211

Penny, J. A., & Johnson, R. L. (2011). The accuracy of performance task scores after resolution of rater disagreement: a Monte Carlo study. Assessing Writing, 16(4), 221-236. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.06.001

Wardle, E., & Roozen, K. (2012). Addressing the complexity of writing development: toward an ecological model of assessment. Assessing Writing, 17(2), 106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.001

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511732997

Yancey, K. B. (1999). Looking back as we look forward: historicizing writing assessment. College Composition and Communication, 50(3), 483-503. doi: 10.2307/358862

Zimmaro, D. M. (2007). Using rubrics to grade student performance. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Centre for teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://ctl.utexas.edu/assets/Evaluation--Assessment/Using-Rubrics-to-Grade-Student-Performance-10-15-07.pdf

How to cite

Citation is provided in standard text format below. For full citation export options, click Export citation.

Thouësny, Sylvie. (2012). Scoring Rubrics and Google Scripts: A Means to Smoothly Provide Language Learners with Fast Corrective Feedback and Grades. In Linda Bradley, Sylvie Thouësny (Eds), CALL: Using, Learning, Knowing, EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 22-25 August 2012, Proceedings (pp. 286-291). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2012.000068

Request permissions

This article is published under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Under this licence, the contents are freely available online (as PDF files) for anybody to read, download, copy, and redistribute provided that the AUTHOR(s), EDITORIAL TEAM and PUBLISHER are properly cited. Commercial use and derivative works are, however, not permitted.

Permission is not required for the republication of tables, figures or illustrations, as long as they are reproduced accurately and the source material is fully cited. It may be the case that the licence does not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. If this is your current situation, please do feel free to ask Research-publishing.net at info@research-publishing.net.

From the same author

Notes on contributors and acknowledgements
Thouësny, Sylvie; Bradley, Linda.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2011.000001
Introduction on views of emergent researchers in L2 teaching and learning with technology
Thouësny, Sylvie; Bradley, Linda.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2011.000003
Dynamically assessing written language: to what extent do learners of French language accept mediation?
Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2011.000011
Preface
Bradley, Linda; Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2012.000014
Notes on Contributors
Fowley, Cathy; English, Claire; Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2013.000076
Acknowledgements
Fowley, Cathy; English, Claire; Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2013.000077
Introduction on Internet Research, Theory, and Practice: Perspectives from Ireland
Fowley, Cathy; English, Claire; Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2013.000079
Internet-based textual interventions and interactions: how language learners engage online in a written task
Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2013.000095
Applying dynamic assessment principles to online peer revisions in written English for specific purposes
Thouësny, Sylvie; Bradley, Linda.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2014.000247
Computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous corrective feedback provided by trainee teachers to learners of French: a preliminary study
Vidal, Julie; Thouësny, Sylvie.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000389